0
Correspondence |

Halfway Technology for the Vegetative State

Sergio Canavero, MD (US FMGEMS)
[+] Author Affiliations

Copyright 2010 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.

More Author Information
Arch Neurol. 2010;67(6):777-777. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2010.102
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Schiff and colleagues’1 reply to criticism that deep brain stimulation (DBS) for the minimally conscious state is a “halfway” solution, whereby “progress in digestion and mobility” may ethically clash with a heightened awareness of disability on the part of the patient, a likely liability.

We encountered the same criticism when we announced in December 2008 that, following bifocal extradural cortical stimulation in the setting of a proof-of-principle study (Project Lazarus), a patient in a permanent vegetative state (19 months) became minimally conscious, with improved digestion and mobility.2

First, those who criticize such undertakings should tell us what they intend to do with these patients: leave them suspended until death arrives, which counters the basic foundations of medicine, ie, improving illness of whatever nature, or terminate them (eg, via high-dose opioid injection), which is also against the hippocratic tradition?

On the other end, Schiff and colleagues gloss over the fact that DBS is not a completely safe technique: hemorrhage-related mortality is a well-known complication of DBS. Bifocal extradural cortical stimulation is a noninvasive technique that can resynchronize wide swaths of cortical tissue and feed directly to the thalamus, with no mortality or disabling morbidity.3 Most importantly, cortical stimulation can be synergistic with neurorehabilitation interventions, and noninvasive cortical stimulation (eg, transcranial magnetic stimulation) can both refine surgical targeting and provide therapeutic benefit.3

I strongly urge those involved to consider the ease of the cortical stimulation approach over the resource-intensive non–risk-free DBS approach. Moreover, a synergistic effect with standard rehabilitation is demonstrated. This would make the procedure more ethical, at least under the safety, rationale, and efficacy profile.

To the critics, the words of Dr William Osler: “One thing is certain; it is not for you to don the black cap and, assuming the judicial function, take hope away from ANY patient . . . hope that comes to us all.”

AUTHOR INFORMATION

Correspondence: Dr Canavero, Turin Advanced Neuromodulation Group, Corso Einaudi 2, 10128 Torino, Italy (solara@infinito.it).

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

REFERENCES

Schiff  ND, Giacino  JT, Fins  JJ. Deep brain stimulation, neuroethics and the minimally conscious state. Arch Neurol 2009;66 (6) 697- 702
PubMed
Canavero  S, Massa-Micon  B, Cauda  F, Montanaro  E. Bifocal extradural cortical stimulation-induced recovery of consciousness in the permanent post-traumatic vegetative state. J Neurol 2009;256 (5) 834- 836
PubMed
Canavero  S. Textbook of Therapeutic Cortical Stimulation.  New York, NY Nova Biomedical2009;

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Schiff  ND, Giacino  JT, Fins  JJ. Deep brain stimulation, neuroethics and the minimally conscious state. Arch Neurol 2009;66 (6) 697- 702
PubMed
Canavero  S, Massa-Micon  B, Cauda  F, Montanaro  E. Bifocal extradural cortical stimulation-induced recovery of consciousness in the permanent post-traumatic vegetative state. J Neurol 2009;256 (5) 834- 836
PubMed
Canavero  S. Textbook of Therapeutic Cortical Stimulation.  New York, NY Nova Biomedical2009;

Correspondence

CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles