0
Original Contributions |

Neuromyelitis Optica IgG Serostatus in Fulminant Central Nervous System Inflammatory Demyelinating DiseaseNMO IgG Serostatus in CNS Demyelinating Disease FREE

Setty M. Magaña, BS; Sean J. Pittock, MD; Vanda A. Lennon, MD, PhD; B. Mark Keegan, MD; Brian G. Weinshenker, MD; Claudia F. Lucchinetti, MD
[+] Author Affiliations

Copyright 2009 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.

More Author Information
Arch Neurol. 2009;66(8):964-966. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2009.152
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Background  The aquaporin-4–specific serum autoantibody neuromyelitis optica (NMO) IgG is a validated biomarker distinguishing NMO spectrum disorders from multiple sclerosis (MS). Because fulminant attacks are more common in NMO spectrum disorders than in MS, some investigators suggest that NMO IgG may be a marker of destructive demyelination rather than a disease-specific biomarker. To our knowledge, this study is the first to compare NMO IgG serostatus among patients with fulminant central nervous system inflammatory demyelinating disease (CNS IDD).

Objective  To determine whether NMO IgG distinguishes patients with NMO spectrum disorders from those with other fulminant corticosteroid-refractory CNS IDD.

Design  Descriptive historical cohort.

Setting  Neuroimmunology laboratory and neurology practice, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.

Patients  Serum samples from 74 patients who underwent plasmapheresis between February 24, 1993, and November 22, 2007, for a corticosteroid-refractory CNS IDD were tested for NMO IgG by indirect immunofluorescence assay.

Main Outcome Measures  Two blinded observers scored serum samples tested at 1:120 dilution. Clinical data were obtained by medical record review.

Results  Preplasmapheresis serum samples were available from 74 patients (ratio of women to men, 2:5); the mean interval between blood draw and plasmapheresis was 13 days. At the time of plasmapheresis, the mean age of patients was 46 years (age range, 7-80 years); the mean Expanded Disability Status Scale score was 7.0 (score range, 3.5-9.5 [10.0 is death]). Diagnoses included MS (18 patients with definite and 11 patients with probable), longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis involving at least 3 vertebral segments (20 patients), NMO (14 patients), transverse myelitis involving fewer than 3 vertebral segments (8 patients), optic neuritis (2 patients), and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (1 patient). Neuromyelitis optica IgG was detected in 20 patients (27%) (10 with longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis, 9 with NMO, and 1 with recurrent optic neuritis) and was not detected in any patient with MS, short transverse myelitis, monophasic optic neuritis, or acute disseminated encephalomyelitis.

Conclusion  Neuromyelitis optica IgG is a specific biomarker for NMO spectrum disorders and is not simply a marker of destructive CNS IDD.

Figures in this Article

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is a severe demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS), conventionally recognized for its propensity to preferentially affect the optic nerves and spinal cord. Typically, NMO has a worse clinical outcome than multiple sclerosis (MS), with more frequent and earlier relapses.1 Prototypic MS is not usually fulminant in nature, and MS lesions are not typically destructive. This is in contrast to NMO. It tends to be more fulminant and is characterized immunopathologically by destructive lesions affecting gray and white matter, with necrosis, vascular hyalinization, eosinophilic and neutrophilic inflammatory infiltrates, and extensive vasculocentric deposits of immunoglobulins and complement.2 Early distinction of NMO from MS is prognostically and therapeutically important because their optimal treatments differ (immunosuppression for NMO and immunomodulation for MS).1 Although the aquaporin-4–specific autoantibody NMO IgG has been convincingly shown to be a biomarker that reliably distinguishes NMO spectrum disorders from classic MS, to our knowledge, no previous study has investigated the specificity of NMO IgG expressly in the setting of fulminant NMO compared with fulminant CNS inflammatory demyelinating disease (CNS IDD).3 13 Fulminant attacks are more common in NMO than in MS; therefore, some investigators suggest that NMO IgG may simply be a marker of fulminant CNS IDD rather than a specific marker for NMO.1 Plasmapheresis is an effective treatment for corticosteroid-refractory fulminant attacks of CNS IDD.14 In this study, we analyze NMO IgG serostatus among a cohort of patients with CNS IDD who underwent plasmapheresis for a fulminant attack to determine whether NMO IgG is merely a marker of a destructive CNS demyelinating process or is, indeed, a specific biomarker for NMO spectrum disorders.

Mayo Clinic patients treated between February 24, 1993, and November 22, 2007, by plasmapheresis for a fulminant corticosteroid-refractory attack of CNS IDD were identified from a larger cohort undergoing plasmapheresis (n = 212). Inclusion criteria were the following: (1) CNS IDD, (2) plasmapheresis for a fulminant corticosteroid-refractory CNS IDD attack, and (3) archival serum samples collected 0 to 3 months before plasmapheresis. Serum samples were tested for NMO IgG by indirect immunofluorescence assay (doubling dilutions, starting at 1:120).4 Titers are the reciprocal of the last dilution scored positive. Two independent observers (S.J.P. and V.A.L.) blinded to diagnosis scored the typical immunostaining pattern as positive (titer ≥120) or negative. Clinical data were obtained by medical record review. Diagnoses were based on the following published criteria: monophasic optic neuritis (ON), MS (probable or definite),15 16 acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM),17 short transverse myelitis (TM) involving fewer than 3 vertebral segments,18 and NMO and NMO spectrum disorders (longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis [LETM] involving ≥3 vertebral segments and recurrent ON).1 Before serum sampling, all patients had received immunosuppressant or immunomodulatory therapies.

Preplasmapheresis serum samples were available from 74 patients (ratio of women to men, 2:5). The mean interval between blood draw and plasmapheresis was 13 days (range, 0-95 days). The mean age of patients at the time of plasmapheresis was 46 years (age range, 7-80 years), and the mean Expanded Disability Status Scale score was 7.0 (score range, 3.5-9.5 [10.0 is death]). Diagnoses at attack onset included the following: MS (29 patients [18 definite and 11 probable]), LETM (20 patients [7 monophasic and 13 recurrent]), NMO (14 patients [1 monophasic and 13 recurrent]), short TM (8 patients [6 monophasic and 2 recurrent]), ON (2 patients [1 monophasic and 1 recurrent]), and ADEM (1 patient). Neuromyelitis optica IgG was detected in 20 patients (27%) (10 with LETM, 9 with NMO, and 1 with recurrent ON). Neuromyelitis optica IgG was undetected in any patient with ADEM, short TM, monophasic ON, or definite or probable MS. Titer values ranged from 240 to 61 140 (Figure). The mean disease duration at the last follow-up was 4.8 years (range, 48 days to 38 years). At the last follow-up, 10 of 20 patients (50%) with NMO IgG seropositivity had subsequent relapses, and 5 patients with LETM (3 with NMO IgG seropositivity) had progressed to meet diagnostic criteria for definite NMO. Patient diagnoses at the last follow-up included 27 with MS (22 definite and 5 probable), 19 with recurrent NMO, 14 with LETM (4 monophasic and 10 recurrent), 7 with short TM (5 monophasic and 2 recurrent), and 1 each with ADEM, recurrent ON, monophasic ON, and clinically isolated demyelinating syndrome. Diagnoses were unknown for 3 patients.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure.

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) IgG titer values by clinical diagnosis at attack onset. Neuromyelitis optica IgG was detected exclusively in patients with NMO spectrum disorders and was notably absent in any patient with multiple sclerosis (MS), short transverse myelitis (TM), monophasic optic neuritis (ON), or acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM). LETM indicates longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis; M, monophasic; and R, recurrent.

Grahic Jump Location

Neuromyelitis optica is often misdiagnosed as MS and is still considered by some to be a variant of MS. Recently reported clinical, radiographic, pathologic, and immunologic characteristics of NMO have led to recognition of NMO as a distinct entity from prototypic MS.1 Discovery of the aquaporin-4–specific autoantibody NMO IgG defined a specific humoral immune response associated with NMO and supported the existence of distinct underlying immunopathogenic mechanisms in NMO and MS.3 13 ,19 However, these previous studies examined the specificity of NMO IgG in the setting of classic nonfulminant MS. Because fulminant attacks are more frequent in NMO spectrum disorders and are atypical in MS, the question of whether NMO IgG is simply a marker of fulminant CNS IDD has remained unaddressed, to our knowledge. The present study confirms previous findings that NMO IgG is a specific biomarker for NMO and its spectrum disorders and establishes that it is not an accompaniment of other severe inflammatory CNS demyelinating diseases, even in fulminant cases.4 Neuromyelitis optica IgG was restricted to patients with NMO or an NMO spectrum disorder. It was not detected in any patient with fulminant MS or another CNS IDD. Our observations further support that NMO is a distinct entity from MS and emphasize the necessity for early diagnosis to ensure early initiation of appropriate immunosuppressive therapies.

Correspondence: Claudia F. Lucchinetti, MD, Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Ave SW, Rochester, MN 55902 (lucchinetti.claudia@mayo.edu).

Accepted for Publication: February 24, 2009.

Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Magaña, Pittock, Lennon, and Lucchinetti. Acquisition of data: Magaña and Pittock. Analysis and interpretation of data: Magaña, Pittock, Weinshenker, and Lucchinetti. Drafting of the manuscript: Magaña. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Magaña, Pittock, Lennon, Keegan, Weinshenker, and Lucchinetti. Obtained funding: Lennon. Administrative, technical, and material support: Magaña and Pittock. Study supervision: Magaña, Pittock, Lennon, and Lucchinetti.

Financial Disclosure: In accord with the Bayh-Dole Act of 1980 and Mayo Foundation policy, Drs Lennon, Weinshenker, and Lucchinetti stand to receive royalties for intellectual property related to the aquaporin-4 autoantigen. To date, the authors have received less than $10 000 in royalties. Dr Weinshenker served as a consultant to Genentech Inc for development of a clinical trial for NMO, which does not relate directly to the subject of this article.

Funding/Support: This work was supported by Clinical and Translational Science Awards grant 1 TL1 RR024152-01 from the National Institutes of Health (Ms Magaña) and by the Guthy-Jackson Charitable Foundation (Drs Lennon, Weinshenker, and Lucchinetti).

Additional Contributions: Lea Dacy, AB, provided assistance in the preparation of the manuscript.

Wingerchuk  DM, Lennon  VA, Lucchinetti  CF, Pittock  SJ, Weinshenker  BG. The spectrum of neuromyelitis optica. Lancet Neurol 2007;6 (9) 805- 815
PubMed
Lucchinetti  CF, Mandler  RN, McGavern  D.  et al.  A role for humoral mechanisms in the pathogenesis of Devic's neuromyelitis optica. Brain 2002;125 (pt 7) 1450- 1461
PubMed
Nakashima  I, Fujihara  K, Miyazawa  I.  et al.  Clinical and MRI features of Japanese patients with multiple sclerosis positive for NMO-IgG. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77 (9) 1073- 1075
PubMed
Lennon  VA, Wingerchuk  DM, Kryzer  TJ.  et al.  A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2004;364 (9451) 2106- 2112
PubMed
Scott  TF, Kassab  SL, Pittock  SJ. Neuromyelitis optica IgG status in acute partial transverse myelitis. Arch Neurol 2006;63 (10) 1398- 1400
PubMed
Tanaka  K, Tani  T, Tanaka  M.  et al.  Anti–aquaporin 4 antibody in selected Japanese multiple sclerosis patients with long spinal cord lesions. Mult Scler 2007;13 (7) 850- 855
PubMed
Takahashi  T, Fujihara  K, Nakashima  I.  et al.  Anti–aquaporin-4 antibody is involved in the pathogenesis of NMO: a study on antibody titre. Brain 2007;130 (pt 5) 1235- 1243
PubMed
Matsuoka  T, Matsushita  T, Kawano  Y.  et al.  Heterogeneity of aquaporin-4 autoimmunity and spinal cord lesions in multiple sclerosis in Japanese. Brain 2007;130 (pt 5) 1206- 1223
PubMed
Paul  F, Jarius  S, Aktas  O.  et al.  Antibody to aquaporin 4 in the diagnosis of neuromyelitis optica. PLoS Med 2007;4 (4) e133http://medicine.plosjournals.org/archive/1549-1676/4/4/pdf/10.1371_journal.pmed.0040133-S.pdf. Accessed May 4, 2009
PubMed
Saiz  A, Zuliani  L, Blanco  Y, Tavolato  B, Giometto  B, Graus  F.Spanish-Italian NMO Study Group,  Revised diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica (NMO): application in a series of suspected patients. J Neurol 2007;254 (9) 1233- 1237
PubMed
Tanaka  M, Tanaka  K, Komori  M, Saida  T. Anti–aquaporin 4 antibody in Japanese multiple sclerosis: the presence of optic spinal multiple sclerosis without long spinal cord lesions and anti–aquaporin 4 antibody. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;78 (9) 990- 992
PubMed
Banwell  B, Tenembaum  S, Lennon  VA.  et al.  Neuromyelitis optica–IgG in childhood inflammatory demyelinating CNS disorders. Neurology 2008;70 (5) 344- 352
PubMed
Marignier  R, De Seze  J, Vukusic  S.  et al.  NMO-IgG and Devic's neuromyelitis optica: a French experience. Mult Scler 2008;14 (4) 440- 445
PubMed
Keegan  M, Pineda  AA, McClelland  RL, Darby  CH, Rodriguez  M, Weinshenker  BG. Plasma exchange for severe attacks of CNS demyelination: predictors of response. Neurology 2002;58 (1) 143- 146
PubMed
Poser  CM, Paty  DW, Scheinberg  L.  et al.  New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 1983;13 (3) 227- 231
PubMed
McDonald  WI, Compston  A, Edan  G.  et al.  Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001;50 (1) 121- 127
PubMed
Wingerchuk  DM, Lucchinetti  CF. Comparative immunopathogenesis of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, neuromyelitis optica, and multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol 2007;20 (3) 343- 350
PubMed
Transverse Myelitis Consortium Working Group,  Proposed diagnostic criteria and nosology of acute transverse myelitis. Neurology 2002;59 (4) 499- 505
PubMed
Roemer  SF, Parisi  JE, Lennon  VA.  et al.  Pattern-specific loss of aquaporin-4 immunoreactivity distinguishes neuromyelitis optica from multiple sclerosis. Brain 2007;130 (pt 5) 1194- 1205
PubMed

First Page Preview

First page PDF preview

Figures

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Figure.

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) IgG titer values by clinical diagnosis at attack onset. Neuromyelitis optica IgG was detected exclusively in patients with NMO spectrum disorders and was notably absent in any patient with multiple sclerosis (MS), short transverse myelitis (TM), monophasic optic neuritis (ON), or acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM). LETM indicates longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis; M, monophasic; and R, recurrent.

Grahic Jump Location

Tables

Interactive Graphics

Video

Country-Specific Mortality and Growth Failure in Infancy and Yound Children and Association With Material Stature

Use interactive graphics and maps to view and sort country-specific infant and early dhildhood mortality and growth failure data and their association with maternal

Wingerchuk  DM, Lennon  VA, Lucchinetti  CF, Pittock  SJ, Weinshenker  BG. The spectrum of neuromyelitis optica. Lancet Neurol 2007;6 (9) 805- 815
PubMed
Lucchinetti  CF, Mandler  RN, McGavern  D.  et al.  A role for humoral mechanisms in the pathogenesis of Devic's neuromyelitis optica. Brain 2002;125 (pt 7) 1450- 1461
PubMed
Nakashima  I, Fujihara  K, Miyazawa  I.  et al.  Clinical and MRI features of Japanese patients with multiple sclerosis positive for NMO-IgG. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77 (9) 1073- 1075
PubMed
Lennon  VA, Wingerchuk  DM, Kryzer  TJ.  et al.  A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis. Lancet 2004;364 (9451) 2106- 2112
PubMed
Scott  TF, Kassab  SL, Pittock  SJ. Neuromyelitis optica IgG status in acute partial transverse myelitis. Arch Neurol 2006;63 (10) 1398- 1400
PubMed
Tanaka  K, Tani  T, Tanaka  M.  et al.  Anti–aquaporin 4 antibody in selected Japanese multiple sclerosis patients with long spinal cord lesions. Mult Scler 2007;13 (7) 850- 855
PubMed
Takahashi  T, Fujihara  K, Nakashima  I.  et al.  Anti–aquaporin-4 antibody is involved in the pathogenesis of NMO: a study on antibody titre. Brain 2007;130 (pt 5) 1235- 1243
PubMed
Matsuoka  T, Matsushita  T, Kawano  Y.  et al.  Heterogeneity of aquaporin-4 autoimmunity and spinal cord lesions in multiple sclerosis in Japanese. Brain 2007;130 (pt 5) 1206- 1223
PubMed
Paul  F, Jarius  S, Aktas  O.  et al.  Antibody to aquaporin 4 in the diagnosis of neuromyelitis optica. PLoS Med 2007;4 (4) e133http://medicine.plosjournals.org/archive/1549-1676/4/4/pdf/10.1371_journal.pmed.0040133-S.pdf. Accessed May 4, 2009
PubMed
Saiz  A, Zuliani  L, Blanco  Y, Tavolato  B, Giometto  B, Graus  F.Spanish-Italian NMO Study Group,  Revised diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica (NMO): application in a series of suspected patients. J Neurol 2007;254 (9) 1233- 1237
PubMed
Tanaka  M, Tanaka  K, Komori  M, Saida  T. Anti–aquaporin 4 antibody in Japanese multiple sclerosis: the presence of optic spinal multiple sclerosis without long spinal cord lesions and anti–aquaporin 4 antibody. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2007;78 (9) 990- 992
PubMed
Banwell  B, Tenembaum  S, Lennon  VA.  et al.  Neuromyelitis optica–IgG in childhood inflammatory demyelinating CNS disorders. Neurology 2008;70 (5) 344- 352
PubMed
Marignier  R, De Seze  J, Vukusic  S.  et al.  NMO-IgG and Devic's neuromyelitis optica: a French experience. Mult Scler 2008;14 (4) 440- 445
PubMed
Keegan  M, Pineda  AA, McClelland  RL, Darby  CH, Rodriguez  M, Weinshenker  BG. Plasma exchange for severe attacks of CNS demyelination: predictors of response. Neurology 2002;58 (1) 143- 146
PubMed
Poser  CM, Paty  DW, Scheinberg  L.  et al.  New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols. Ann Neurol 1983;13 (3) 227- 231
PubMed
McDonald  WI, Compston  A, Edan  G.  et al.  Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. Ann Neurol 2001;50 (1) 121- 127
PubMed
Wingerchuk  DM, Lucchinetti  CF. Comparative immunopathogenesis of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, neuromyelitis optica, and multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol 2007;20 (3) 343- 350
PubMed
Transverse Myelitis Consortium Working Group,  Proposed diagnostic criteria and nosology of acute transverse myelitis. Neurology 2002;59 (4) 499- 505
PubMed
Roemer  SF, Parisi  JE, Lennon  VA.  et al.  Pattern-specific loss of aquaporin-4 immunoreactivity distinguishes neuromyelitis optica from multiple sclerosis. Brain 2007;130 (pt 5) 1194- 1205
PubMed

Correspondence

CME Course for:


You need to register in order to view this quiz.


To understand the clinical management of acute heart failure syndromes.
Accreditation Information The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians.
The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
To view and print your certificate and access a summary of your CME courses go to My CME.
NOTE:
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s “Cited By” API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Response

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles