We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editorial |

Defining Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Response With Magnetic Resonance Imaging How Much Activity Is Too Much?

Paul S. Giacomini, MD, FRCP(C); Douglas L. Arnold, MD; Amit Bar-Or, MD, FRCP(C), MSc; Jack P. Antel, MD
Arch Neurol. 2009;66(1):19-20. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2008.529.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart's memorable quote “I cannot define it, but I know it when I see it” was initially used in reference to obscenity; however, it is equally applicable to identifying treatment failure in multiple sclerosis (MS).

Defining treatment failure in MS is notoriously difficult. The available disease-modifying therapies are only partially effective in suppressing disease activity, and the disease itself can go into periods of remission spontaneously. The thresholds used for defining treatment failure, or “suboptimal response” as it is often called, vary considerably between clinicians. Some clinicians ignore worsening magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) activity in the context of a clinically “stable” patient with no new symptoms of a relapse. Some would argue that a single new lesion is evidence of disease activity and therefore a suboptimal response. In the middle ground, there is much uncertainty and few data about how much disease activity should be tolerated before deciding that partially effective therapies are failing.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

8 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Original Article: Does This Patient Have a Torn Meniscus or Ligament of the Knee?

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis