0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Clinical Implications of Basic Neuroscience Research |

Neurological Complications of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 Infection FREE

Joseph R. Berger, MD; Sidney Houff, MD, PhD
[+] Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations:Department of Neurology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington.


Section Editor: Hassan M. Fathallah-shaykh, MD

More Author Information
Arch Neurol. 2008;65(5):596-600. doi:10.1001/archneur.65.5.596.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) infection is responsible for significant neurological morbidity, perhaps more than any other virus. Seroprevalence studies suggest that as many as 45 million people in the United States have been infected with HSV-2, and the estimated incidence of new infection is 1 million annually. Substantial numbers of these persons will manifest neurological symptoms that are generally, although not always, mild and self-limited. Despite a 50% genetic homology between HSV-1 and HSV-2, there are significant differences in the clinical manifestations of these 2 viruses. We herein review the neurological complications of HSV-2 infection.

The herpes viruses are responsible for significant neurological morbidity. Three of the 8 human herpes virus types—herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1), HSV-2, and varicella zoster virus—establish latency in the peripheral sensory ganglia and persist in the host for a lifetime. Primary infection occurs at a mucocutaneous surface with retrograde transportation of the virus to the peripheral sensory ganglia, maintenance of the viral genome within the peripheral sensory ganglia, and periodic reactivation with antegrade transmission to the nerve endings and mucocutaneous surface.

Herpes simplex virus type 2–associated neurological disease may result from primary infection or reactivation of latent HSV-2. Neurological disease after primary HSV-2 infection is seen most often in neonates. After the neonatal period, HSV-2 infection is principally, but not exclusively, acquired through sexual activity. Primary HSV-2 infection is delayed in most individuals until adolescence and early adulthood with the advent of sexual activity. By the time of HSV-2 infection, most individuals have already been infected by HSV-1. Primary HSV-2 infection in immunocompetent adolescents and adults is usually asymptomatic, with most patients being unaware of their HSV-2 exposure.

Neurons in the sacral ganglia traditionally have been considered to be the site of HSV-2 latency. Examination of HSV-2 latency using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques have demonstrated HSV-2 latency in ganglia throughout the central nervous system (CNS) axis, albeit at significantly lower frequencies than in the sacral ganglia. Latency of HSV-2 has also been demonstrated to occur in trigeminal ganglia. The widespread latency of HSV-2 suggests that the virus may reach ganglia far removed from the site of primary infection. The molecular mechanisms underlying HSV latency are incompletely understood.

Although reactivation of latent HSV primarily has been studied in HSV-1–infected cells, it is likely that similar mechanisms underlie reactivation of HSV-2. Latent HSV infection is reactivated by local and systemic stimuli. Current evidence suggests that the most plausible mechanism for HSV reactivation is stimulation of latently infected cells through pathways yet to be determined. The fate of neurons supporting replication of reactivated HSV remains undecided. Many patients with HSV-2 infection shed low levels of virus continuously without demonstrated reactivation.

Humans are the only known reservoir of HSV-2. The frequency of HSV-2 seropositivity varies by population. An estimated 45 million persons in the United States have genital herpes infection,1with new infections occurring at an estimated rate of approximately 1 million per year. Approximately 85% to 90% of infections are unrecognized and therefore remain undiagnosed. Seropositivity for HSV-2 correlates with the number of sexual partners, the age of sexual debut, increasing age, black or Hispanic race, female sex, and the presence of other sexually transmitted diseases, including human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.2Despite the widespread adoption of safer sex methods with the advent of the AIDS pandemic, seroprevalence studies in the United States suggest that the frequency of HSV-2 infection is increasing.1Seroprevalence rates for HSV-2 in the developed world are not very different than those of the United States.

Although HSV-1 has a predilection for the development of encephalitis after intracerebral injection in the mouse model, HSV-2 generally causes meningitis. However, the meninges are not the only component of the CNS involved in HSV-2 infection. Virtually any part of the neuraxis may be affected by this virus, including the retina, brain, brainstem, cranial nerves, spinal cord, and nerve roots.

When HSV-2 infection is mentioned, neonatal herpes simplex encephalitis (HSE), a devastating disorder, is the disease most commonly considered. Seventy percent of affected neonates are born to mothers without symptoms or signs of genital herpes. Recent studies suggest that as much as 30% of neonatal HSE is due to HSV-1. The risk of acquisition during a primary infection with HSV-1 or HSV-2 is 50%. The risk of development of neonatal HSE is reduced if a mother with primary HSV-2 genital herpetic infection is seropositive for HSV-1. Risk factors for neonatal HSV disease include first-episode maternal infection in the third trimester, invasive monitoring, delivery before a gestational age of 38 weeks, and maternal age of less than 21 years.3Delivery by cesarean section significantly reduces the risk of HSV acquisition.3In mothers who are seropositive for HSV-2 only, the risk to the neonate is less than 1%.

Dissemination to the CNS occurs in 70% of all infected neonates and is most commonly heralded by the appearance of focal or generalized seizures. Skin lesions are observed in 66%. Laboratory test results often show abnormal liver function and disseminated intravascular coagulation. The cranial magnetic resonance images (MRIs) and computed tomograms initially show diffuse edema and later cerebral atrophy, calcifications, and cystic encephalomalacia. Electroencephalography shows slow background and paroxysmal discharges. Results of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis are remarkable for a lymphocytic pleocytosis, increased protein levels, and PCR findings that are positive for HSV-2. Neonates with HSE due to HSV-1 have a better prognosis than those with infection due to HSV-2.4The latter group has a higher frequency of seizures, greater CSF pleocytosis and protein concentration, and more CNS structural disease on radiographic images.4

Aseptic meningitis occurs in 36% of women with primary HSV-2 genital infection and 13% of men5; it results in hospitalization for 6.4% of infected women and 1.6% of infected men.5Aseptic meningitis is a rare manifestation of primary HSV-1 genital infection and a rare complication of recurrent genital infections due to HSV-1 and HSV-2. During the prodrome of genital herpes and concomitant with the herpetic eruption, affected patients experience headache, neck stiffness, and low-grade fever. Back, buttock, perineal, and lower extremity pain may be associated with urinary retention and constipation. Analysis of CSF reveals a lymphocytic pleocytosis. Viral cultures of CSF may yield diagnostic findings, but PCR for HSV-2 is recommended.6For samples obtained after the acute infection, measurement of intrathecal antibody levels for HSV-2 may be diagnostically valuable.7

Disease Description

Recurrent aseptic meningitis due to HSV-2 may occur with or without symptomatic herpetic mucocutaneous disorder. The manifestations of this disorder are identical to that observed with primary genital herpes.8In 1 series, recurrent meningitis has been observed in 19%8to 42%9of patients who experience meningitis with their first episode of genital herpes. Headaches occur in as many as 15% of patients with recurrent genital herpes.8Anecdotal experience suggests that suppressive prophylactic therapy with acyclovir sodium, famciclovir, and valacyclovir hydrochloride prevents these recurrences.

Many of these cases were previously diagnosed as Mollaret meningitis, before the recognition that HSV-2 may be causative.10Confusion, focal neurological manifestations, and cranial neuropathies may be observed. Analysis of CSF often reveals a large mononuclear cell with an indistinct cytoplasm referred to as the Mollaret cell. Herpes simplex virus type 2 is not the only virus responsible for Mollaret meningitis, and some authorities have suggested that the term be restricted to recurrent aseptic meningitis without an identifiable cause.7

Report of a Case

A woman aged 33 years presented with a 4-day history of intractable headache, photophobia, nausea, and neck and back discomfort. She had 3 previous hospital admissions for a similar disorder, the first and most severe of which occurred concomitantly with her initial outbreak of genital herpes. Results of her examination were remarkable for a low-grade fever and stiff neck. A contrast-enhanced MRI of the brain yielded normal findings. Results of CSF analysis showed a white blood cell count of 56/μL (90% lymphocytes), a protein level of 66 mg/dL, and a glucose level of 54 mg/dL. Results of PCR were positive for HSV-2. Her symptoms resolved shortly after treatment with intravenous acyclovir, and no further episodes were observed during a suppressive regimen of daily acyclovir in the ensuing 3 years.

Herpes simplex virus type 2 accounts for 1.6% to and 6.5% of all HSE in adults.11It is typically observed in immunosuppressed individuals. Unlike HSV-1, HSV-2 affects mesial temporal or orbitofrontal lobes less often and may demonstrate a predilection for the brainstem. Herpes simplex encephalitis due to HSV-2 may occur without meningitic features. Neurological manifestations may include altered level of consciousness, cranial neuropathies, hemiparesis, and hemisensory loss.12In contrast to HSE due to HSV-1, which typically demonstrates progressive deterioration, a fluctuating course may be observed.13The MRI may show normal findings,13nonspecific white matter lesions, or lesions of orbitofrontal and mesial temporal lobes suggestive of HSE due to HSV-1. These lesions are best seen on T2-weighted or fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images.12

Thoracic or lumbosacral ascending myelitis is also seen with HSV-2 infection but almost exclusively in immunocompromised patients, particularly those with HIV infection. The lesions may be necrotizing and, if so, have a poor prognosis. Recurrent disease also has been described.14The clinical presentation is characterized by pain, often anogenital or radicular, with associated limb numbness, paresthesias, and weakness. Herpetic skin lesions may accompany the neurological manifestations.14An MRI of the spine typically shows enlargement of the lower cord or conus medullaris with an increased signal on T2-weighted images and contrast enhancement of adjacent nerve roots.

Disease Description

In autopsy studies, 40% of sacral dorsal root ganglia contain dormant HSV-2. Only 5% of these individuals had recognized genital herpes infection during life. This disorder is almost always misdiagnosed unless it occurs concomitantly with the initial outbreak of genital herpes. Obtaining a history of recurrent genital herpes outbreaks occurring contemporaneously with the radicular symptoms is very helpful diagnostically. Unfortunately, the patient may be unaware of the infection and the physician may be reluctant to inquire about sexually transmitted disease. Radiculopathy caused by HSV-2 infection typically affects the lumbar or sacral nerve roots and is often recurrent. In addition to radicular pain, paresthesias, urinary retention, constipation, anogenital discomfort, and leg weakness may be observed. Although there are few descriptions of HSV-2 radiculitis and radiculomyelitis,1517nerve root or lower spinal cord edema, enlargement, and hyperintensity on T2-weighted MRI and contrast enhancement are anticipated; however, the lumbosacral MRI may show normal findings.16The disorder is typically self-limited, resolving after days or weeks, but recovery appears to be hastened by the use of antiviral medications.15

Report of a Case

A woman aged 43 years presented with a burning, shooting pain radiating down the back of her left leg and a sense of weakness in the leg of 2 months' duration. Driving and climbing stairs were difficult. She commented on a similar, self-limited discomfort occurring with variable frequency since the birth of her second child 10 years earlier. She had her initial outbreak of genital herpes at that time. Results of the examination showed minimal weakness of the extensor hallucis longus, normal reflexes, and decreased pinprick sensation in an L5 distribution. Titers of IgG HSV-2 antibody were elevated in the blood. Lumbosacral spine MRI with and without contrast showed normal findings. Analysis of CSF showed 12 white blood cells (84% lymphocytes) and a protein level of 54 mg/dL. Results of CSF PCR for HSV-2 were positive. Therapy consisting of acyclovir sodium, 800 mg 3 times daily, was initiated, with prompt resolution of her symptoms. While receiving daily acyclovir suppressive therapy, she had no further recurrences.

Although it has been argued that the presence of detectable viral DNA in the geniculate ganglia of most humans cannot explain the annual incidence of Bell palsy of 20 to 30 per 100 000, there has been increasing acceptance of HSV-1 and varicella zoster virus as the cause of Bell palsy.18Other infectious diseases have been implicated as well. Although sites of viral latency differ between HSV-1 and HSV-2, likely owing to their latency activity transcripts, HSV-2 can certainly be harbored by the trigeminal ganglia. In a study of more than 1000 people, 3.2% shed HSV-2 in their saliva on at least 1 occasion.19Bell palsy has been reported after the discontinuation of acyclovir therapy in a patient being treated for HSE due to HSV-2.12

Acute retinal necrosis is heralded by red eye, periorbital pain, and impaired visual acuity. Examination results will show episcleritis or scleritis, keratic precipitates, retinal vasculitis, and necrosis with retinal detachment. Typically, this sight-threatening disorder has a bimodal age distribution, with varicella zoster virus and HSV-1 infections affecting older patients and HSV-2 infection affecting patients with a median age of 20 years. Acute retinal necrosis may occur in association with HSV-2 meningoencephalitis.

An association between HSV-2 and HIV has been recognized since the onset of the HIV/AIDS pandemic. Recent studies have demonstrated synergism between HSV-2 and HIV. Infection with HSV-2 increases the risk of HIV acquisition 2- to 4-fold compared with patients without HSV-2 infection,20increases the risk of transmitting HIV to partners, and accelerates the progression of HIV infection to AIDS. Reduction of HSV-2 shedding with the use of suppressive therapy with valacyclovir results in a reduction in HIV-1 RNA levels.21,22Infection with HIV, in turn, alters the natural history of HSV-2 infection. Neurological diseases associated with HSV-2 may appear early in the course of HIV/AIDS. Associated neurological diseases reported in HIV-infected patients include HSV-2 lumbosacral radiculoneuropathy, transverse myelitis, and encephalitis.

Polymerase chain reaction assays are rapid, sensitive, and specific for HSV-2 and HSV-1 and constitute the criterion standard for the diagnosis of HSV infections of the nervous system. The development of real-time PCR and methods for identifying HSV-1 and HSV-2 allow rapid identification of HSV in CSF, serum, and other tissues.

The sensitivity and specificity of CSF PCR for HSE due to HSV-1 or HSV-2 infection exceeds 90% in most studies for children and adults. Polymerase chain reaction analysis has been helpful in detecting HSV in perhaps 15% to 20% of patients with mild or atypical forms of HSE, including those with radiculomyelitis, Mollaret meningitis, and Bell palsy. However, an initially negative result for HSV PCR in a patient with a high probability of an HSV neurological disorder significantly reduces but does not exclude the diagnosis.

Viral culture, although frequently negative, and serological assays for HSV antibodies are still useful in several settings. A study of neonatal HSV showed 40% of CSF cultures were positive.23Viral cultures may be of more limited value in HSV-2 recurrences. Serological assays have limited value in the diagnosis of HSV-2–associated neurological diseases. Although several serological assays will differentiate between HSV-2 and HSV-1, the delay in the development of intrathecal antibodies limits their usefulness. Type-specific serological testing can detect prior infection in most HSV-2–infected individuals who are unaware of prior infection. Two serological methods have been validated for the diagnosis of HSE. The HSV-specific antibody index and HSV-specific immunoblotting of oligoclonal IgG require comparison of HSV-specific antibody reactivity in CSF and serum to ensure that serum HSV antibodies have not reached the CSF by means of a sink mechanism.

Vidarabine phosphate was the first agent to demonstrate efficacy in HSE. Two large subsequent studies demonstrated the superiority of acyclovir, and it has been widely adopted as standard therapy.24,25The current recommendation for HSE in adults and children older than 3 months is intravenous acyclovir sodium at a dosage of 10 mg/kg every 8 hours for 14 to 21 days. A clinical trial of oral valacyclovir after intravenous acyclovir for 14 to 21 days is currently being conducted to determine whether prolonged antiviral therapy will improve the outcome and decrease the recurrence rate. Age, level of consciousness at presentation, duration of encephalitis, and HSV viral load all affect the treatment of HSE. In neonates with suspected or proved neonatal HSE, acyclovir sodium is recommended, with a regimen of 20 mg/kg every 8 hours for 14 to 21 days. If HSV-2 DNA is detected in the CSF after 21 days of therapy, intravenous acyclovir therapy is continued for another 14 days and the CSF is reexamined for HSV DNA by means of PCR. Intravenous acyclovir therapy is stopped when the CSF no longer contains HSV DNA. There have been only anecdotal reports of the treatment of other HSV-2–related neurological disease, which suggests that acyclovir sodium at a dosage of 5 to 10 mg/kg 3 times daily is sufficient for the treatment of HSV-2 meningitis and that a dosage of 10 mg/kg 3 times daily is sufficient in myelitis and radiculitis. In patients with HSV-2 myelitis, the addition of high-dose intravenous glucocorticosteroid therapy to antiviral therapy has been suggested to decrease the risk of the development of an ascending myelitis.

Acyclovir-resistant HSV strains have been isolated from immunocompetent and, more commonly, immunocompromised patients. Increasing the dose of acyclovir for the treatment of drug-resistant HSV infections is rarely successful because mutations in the thymidine kinase gene are responsible for drug resistance. Successful treatment with valacyclovir of resistant HSE due to HSV-2 has been reported.13Acyclovir-resistant HSV responds to foscarnet sodium and, possibly, cidofovir.

Correspondence:Joseph R. Berger, MD, Department of Neurology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Kentucky Clinic Room L-445, 740 S Limestone St, Lexington, KY 40536-0284 (jrbneuro@uky.edu).

Accepted for Publication:April 22, 2007.

Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Berger and Houff. Analysis and interpretation of data: Berger. Drafting of the manuscript: Berger and Houff. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Berger. Administrative, technical, and material support: Houff. Study supervision: Berger.

Financial Disclosure:None reported.

Fleming  DTMcQuillan  GMJohnson  RE  et al.  Herpes simplex virus type 2 in the United States, 1976 to 1994. N Engl J Med 1997;337 (16) 1105- 1111
PubMed Link to Article
Mertz  GJ Epidemiology of genital herpes infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1993;7 (4) 825- 839
PubMed
Whitley  R Neonatal herpes simplex virus infection. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2004;17 (3) 243- 246
PubMed Link to Article
Corey  LWhitley  RJStone  EFMohan  K Difference between herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2 neonatal encephalitis in neurological outcome. Lancet 1988;1 (8575-8576) 1- 4
PubMed Link to Article
Corey  LAdams  HGBrown  ZAHolmes  KK Genital herpes simplex virus infections: clinical manifestations, course, and complications. Ann Intern Med 1983;98 (6) 958- 972
PubMed Link to Article
Calvario  ABozzi  AScarasciulli  M  et al.  Herpes consensus PCR test: a useful diagnostic approach to the screening of viral diseases of the central nervous system. J Clin Virol 2002;25 ((suppl 1)) S71- S78
PubMed Link to Article
Tyler  KL Herpes simplex virus infections of the central nervous system: encephalitis and meningitis, including Mollaret’s. Herpes 2004;11 ((suppl 2)) 57A- 64A
PubMed
Bergström  TVahlne  AAlestig  KJeansson  SForsgren  MLycke  E Primary and recurrent herpes simplex virus type 2–induced meningitis. J Infect Dis 1990;162 (2) 322- 330
PubMed Link to Article
Afonso  NGunasena  SGalla  KPodzorski  RChandrasekar  PAlangaden  G Appropriate use of polymerase chain reaction for detection of herpes simplex virus 2 in cerebrospinal fluid of patients at an inner-city hospital. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2007;57 (3) 309- 313
PubMed Link to Article
Stalder  HOxman  MNDawson  DMLevin  MJ Herpes simplex meningitis: isolation of herpes simplex virus type 2 from cerebrospinal fluid. N Engl J Med 1973;289 (24) 1296- 1298.d
PubMed Link to Article
Aurelius  EJohansson  BSkoldenberg  BForsgren  M Encephalitis in immunocompetent patients due to herpes simplex virus type 1 or 2 as determined by type-specific polymerase chain reaction and antibody assays of cerebrospinal fluid. J Med Virol 1993;39 (3) 179- 186
PubMed Link to Article
Chu  KKang  DWLee  JJYoon  BW Atypical brainstem encephalitis caused by herpes simplex virus 2. Arch Neurol 2002;59 (3) 460- 463
PubMed Link to Article
Harrison  NAMacDonald  BKScott  GKapoor  R Atypical herpes type 2 encephalitis associated with normal MRI imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74 (7) 974- 976
PubMed Link to Article
Gobbi  CTosi  CStadler  CMerenda  CBernasconi  E Recurrent myelitis associated with herpes simplex virus type 2. Eur Neurol 2001;46 (4) 215- 218
PubMed Link to Article
Eberhardt  OKuker  WDichgans  JWeller  M HSV-2 sacral radiculitis (Elsberg syndrome). Neurology 2004;63 (4) 758- 759
PubMed Link to Article
Ellie  ERozenberg  FDousset  VBeylot-Barry  M Herpes simplex virus type 2 ascending myeloradiculitis: MRI findings and rapid diagnosis by the polymerase chain method. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57 (7) 869- 870
PubMed Link to Article
Küker  WSchaade  LRitter  KNacimiento  W MRI nfi1follow-up of herpes simplex virus (type 1) radiculomyelitis. Neurology 1999;52 (5) 1102- 1103
PubMed Link to Article
Gilbert  SC Bell's palsy and herpesviruses. Herpes 2002;9 (3) 70- 73
PubMed
Wald  AEricsson  MKrantz  ESelke  SCorey  L Oral shedding of herpes simplex virus type 2. Sex Transm Infect 2004;80 (4) 272- 276
PubMed Link to Article
Corey  LWald  ACelum  CLQuinn  TC The effects of herpes simplex virus-2 on HIV-1 acquisition and transmission: a review of two overlapping epidemics. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2004;35 (5) 435- 445
PubMed Link to Article
Nagot  NOuedraogo  AFoulongne  V  et al. ANRS 1285 Study Group, Reduction of HIV-1 RNA levels with therapy to suppress herpes simplex virus. N Engl J Med 2007;356 (8) 790- 799
PubMed Link to Article
Corey  L Synergistic copathogens: HIV-1 and HSV-2. N Engl J Med 2007;356 (8) 854- 856
PubMed Link to Article
Kimberlin  DWLin  CYJacobs  RF  et al. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Collaborative Antiviral Study Group, Natural history of neonatal herpes simplex virus infections in the acyclovir era. Pediatrics 2001;108 (2) 223- 229
PubMed Link to Article
Sköldenberg  BForsgren  MAlestig  K  et al.  Acyclovir versus vidarabine in herpes simplex encephalitis: randomised multicentre study in consecutive Swedish patients. Lancet 1984;2 (8405) 707- 711
PubMed Link to Article
Whitley  RJAlford  CAHirsch  MS  et al.  Vidarabine versus acyclovir therapy in herpes simplex encephalitis. N Engl J Med 1986;314 (3) 144- 149
PubMed Link to Article

Figures

Tables

References

Fleming  DTMcQuillan  GMJohnson  RE  et al.  Herpes simplex virus type 2 in the United States, 1976 to 1994. N Engl J Med 1997;337 (16) 1105- 1111
PubMed Link to Article
Mertz  GJ Epidemiology of genital herpes infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am 1993;7 (4) 825- 839
PubMed
Whitley  R Neonatal herpes simplex virus infection. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2004;17 (3) 243- 246
PubMed Link to Article
Corey  LWhitley  RJStone  EFMohan  K Difference between herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2 neonatal encephalitis in neurological outcome. Lancet 1988;1 (8575-8576) 1- 4
PubMed Link to Article
Corey  LAdams  HGBrown  ZAHolmes  KK Genital herpes simplex virus infections: clinical manifestations, course, and complications. Ann Intern Med 1983;98 (6) 958- 972
PubMed Link to Article
Calvario  ABozzi  AScarasciulli  M  et al.  Herpes consensus PCR test: a useful diagnostic approach to the screening of viral diseases of the central nervous system. J Clin Virol 2002;25 ((suppl 1)) S71- S78
PubMed Link to Article
Tyler  KL Herpes simplex virus infections of the central nervous system: encephalitis and meningitis, including Mollaret’s. Herpes 2004;11 ((suppl 2)) 57A- 64A
PubMed
Bergström  TVahlne  AAlestig  KJeansson  SForsgren  MLycke  E Primary and recurrent herpes simplex virus type 2–induced meningitis. J Infect Dis 1990;162 (2) 322- 330
PubMed Link to Article
Afonso  NGunasena  SGalla  KPodzorski  RChandrasekar  PAlangaden  G Appropriate use of polymerase chain reaction for detection of herpes simplex virus 2 in cerebrospinal fluid of patients at an inner-city hospital. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2007;57 (3) 309- 313
PubMed Link to Article
Stalder  HOxman  MNDawson  DMLevin  MJ Herpes simplex meningitis: isolation of herpes simplex virus type 2 from cerebrospinal fluid. N Engl J Med 1973;289 (24) 1296- 1298.d
PubMed Link to Article
Aurelius  EJohansson  BSkoldenberg  BForsgren  M Encephalitis in immunocompetent patients due to herpes simplex virus type 1 or 2 as determined by type-specific polymerase chain reaction and antibody assays of cerebrospinal fluid. J Med Virol 1993;39 (3) 179- 186
PubMed Link to Article
Chu  KKang  DWLee  JJYoon  BW Atypical brainstem encephalitis caused by herpes simplex virus 2. Arch Neurol 2002;59 (3) 460- 463
PubMed Link to Article
Harrison  NAMacDonald  BKScott  GKapoor  R Atypical herpes type 2 encephalitis associated with normal MRI imaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74 (7) 974- 976
PubMed Link to Article
Gobbi  CTosi  CStadler  CMerenda  CBernasconi  E Recurrent myelitis associated with herpes simplex virus type 2. Eur Neurol 2001;46 (4) 215- 218
PubMed Link to Article
Eberhardt  OKuker  WDichgans  JWeller  M HSV-2 sacral radiculitis (Elsberg syndrome). Neurology 2004;63 (4) 758- 759
PubMed Link to Article
Ellie  ERozenberg  FDousset  VBeylot-Barry  M Herpes simplex virus type 2 ascending myeloradiculitis: MRI findings and rapid diagnosis by the polymerase chain method. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994;57 (7) 869- 870
PubMed Link to Article
Küker  WSchaade  LRitter  KNacimiento  W MRI nfi1follow-up of herpes simplex virus (type 1) radiculomyelitis. Neurology 1999;52 (5) 1102- 1103
PubMed Link to Article
Gilbert  SC Bell's palsy and herpesviruses. Herpes 2002;9 (3) 70- 73
PubMed
Wald  AEricsson  MKrantz  ESelke  SCorey  L Oral shedding of herpes simplex virus type 2. Sex Transm Infect 2004;80 (4) 272- 276
PubMed Link to Article
Corey  LWald  ACelum  CLQuinn  TC The effects of herpes simplex virus-2 on HIV-1 acquisition and transmission: a review of two overlapping epidemics. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2004;35 (5) 435- 445
PubMed Link to Article
Nagot  NOuedraogo  AFoulongne  V  et al. ANRS 1285 Study Group, Reduction of HIV-1 RNA levels with therapy to suppress herpes simplex virus. N Engl J Med 2007;356 (8) 790- 799
PubMed Link to Article
Corey  L Synergistic copathogens: HIV-1 and HSV-2. N Engl J Med 2007;356 (8) 854- 856
PubMed Link to Article
Kimberlin  DWLin  CYJacobs  RF  et al. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Collaborative Antiviral Study Group, Natural history of neonatal herpes simplex virus infections in the acyclovir era. Pediatrics 2001;108 (2) 223- 229
PubMed Link to Article
Sköldenberg  BForsgren  MAlestig  K  et al.  Acyclovir versus vidarabine in herpes simplex encephalitis: randomised multicentre study in consecutive Swedish patients. Lancet 1984;2 (8405) 707- 711
PubMed Link to Article
Whitley  RJAlford  CAHirsch  MS  et al.  Vidarabine versus acyclovir therapy in herpes simplex encephalitis. N Engl J Med 1986;314 (3) 144- 149
PubMed Link to Article

Correspondence

CME
Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Submit a Comment

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Web of Science® Times Cited: 17

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections