0
We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
Retry
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Book and Media Review |

Review of Neurocinema: When Film Meets Neurology

Henrik Heitmann, MD1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Department of Neurology, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
JAMA Neurol. 2016;73(1):129. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.2418.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Extract

Neurocinema covers a topic of great interest to anyone working in the field of neurology. How are neurologic disorders and the physicians treating them portrayed in film and, therefore, most likely perceived by the general public?

To answer this question, Eelco F. M. Wijdicks reviews a wide range of films from Hollywood productions to documentaries. He discusses their content and rates their scientific accuracy. The book is divided into 7 chapters. Starting with an introductory overview chapter titled “Medicine in Film,” the book then moves on to analyze the presentation of “The Neurologist in Film,” “Neurologic Disorders in Film,” “Neuroethics in Film,” “Neurologic Disorders in Documentary Film,” and “Neurofollies in Film.” To assess scientific accuracy, he rates films on a scale from 1 to 4 reflex hammers, with 1 reflex hammer meaning “incorrect depictions” and 4 reflex hammers meaning “mandatory viewing.” Films mentioned in the sixth chapter (ie, “Neurofollies in Film”) are rated on a scale from 1 to 3 pinpricks, with 1 pinprick meaning “highly improbable plot” and 3 pinpricks meaning “hats off to the screenwriter’s imagination.”

Topics

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview

Figures

Tables

References

Correspondence

CME
Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.

Multimedia

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

259 Views
0 Citations
×

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Jobs
brightcove.createExperiences();