We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Editorial |

Secondary Prevention Trials in Alzheimer Disease The Challenge of Identifying a Meaningful End Point

Richard J. Kryscio, PhD1
[+] Author Affiliations
1Departments of Statistics and Biostatistics and the Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky, Lexington
JAMA Neurol. 2014;71(8):947-949. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.1120.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


The chief difference between a primary prevention trial and a secondary prevention trial (SPT) in Alzheimer disease (AD) is related to the targeted group of participants. As currently conceptualized, a primary prevention trial recruits asymptomatic individuals from the general population, whereas an SPT recruits only asymptomatic (or preclinical) individuals who are biomarker-positive for AD.1 Recent examples of the latter include the AD kindred trial in Antioquia, Colombia, which recruits only participants who are PS1 E280A mutation carriers with a familial history of early-onset disease, and the Anti-Amyloid Treatment in Asymptomatic Alzheimer’s study (hereafter referred to as the A4 study), which targets adults 70 years of age or older with high amyloid levels in the brain as determined by a positron emission tomographic scan. The latter study is the subject of the article by Donohue et al,2 who seek to identify a primary end point for that SPT.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

9 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections
PubMed Articles

Care at the Close of Life: Evidence and Experience
Alzheimer Disease: "It's OK, Mama, If You Want to Go, It's OK"

The Rational Clinical Examination: Evidence-Based Clinical Diagnosis
Supplemental Content