Original Contributions |

Beneficial Plasma Exchange Response in Central Nervous System Inflammatory Demyelination

Setty M. Magaña, BS; B. Mark Keegan, MD; Brian G. Weinshenker, MD; Bradley J. Erickson, MD, PhD; Sean J. Pittock, MD; Vanda A. Lennon, MD, PhD; Moses Rodriguez, MD; Kristine Thomsen, BA; Stephen Weigand, MS; Jay Mandrekar, PhD; Linda Linbo, RN; Claudia F. Lucchinetti, MD
Arch Neurol. 2011;68(7):870-878. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2011.34.
Text Size: A A A
Published online

Background Plasma exchange (PLEX) is a beneficial rescue therapy for acute, steroid-refractory central nervous system inflammatory demyelinating disease (CNS-IDD). Despite the approximately 45% PLEX response rate reported among patients with CNS-IDD, determinants of interindividual differences in PLEX response are not well characterized.

Objective To perform an exploratory analysis of clinical, radiographic, and serological features associated with beneficial PLEX response.

Design Historical cohort study.

Setting Neurology practice, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota.

Patients All Mayo Clinic patients treated with PLEX between January 5, 1999, and November 12, 2007, for a steroid-refractory CNS-IDD attack.

Main Outcome Measure The PLEX response in attack-related, targeted neurological deficit(s) assessed within the 6-month period following PLEX.

Results We identified 153 patients treated with PLEX for a steroid-refractory CNS-IDD, of whom 90 (59%) exhibited moderate to marked functional neurological improvement within 6 months following treatment. Pre-PLEX clinical features associated with a beneficial PLEX response were shorter disease duration (P = .02) and preserved deep tendon reflexes (P = .001); post-PLEX variables included a diagnosis of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (P = .008) and a lower Expanded Disability Status Scale score (P < .001) at last follow-up. Plasma exchange was less effective for patients with multiple sclerosis who subsequently developed a progressive disease course (P = .046). Radiographic features associated with a beneficial PLEX response were presence of ring-enhancing lesions (odds ratio = 4.00; P = .03) and/or mass effect (odds ratio = 3.00; P = .02). No association was found between neuromyelitis optica–IgG serostatus and PLEX response.

Conclusions We have identified clinical and radiographic features that may aid in identifying patients with fulminant, steroid-refractory CNS-IDD attacks who are more likely to respond to PLEX.

Figures in this Article

Sign In to Access Full Content

Don't have Access?

Register and get free email Table of Contents alerts, saved searches, PowerPoint downloads, CME quizzes, and more

Subscribe for full-text access to content from 1998 forward and a host of useful features

Activate your current subscription (AMA members and current subscribers)

Purchase Online Access to this article for 24 hours


Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Graphic Jump Location

Figure 1. Ascertainment of plasma exchange (PLEX) cohort and sample size for each analysis. †Exclusions included receiving fewer than 2 exchanges (n = 2) and receiving PLEX for an attack related to a coexisting condition and not for a central nervous system inflammatory demyelinating disease (CNS-IDD) attack (diabetic neuropathy, n = 1; polycythemia vera, n = 1). MRI indicates magnetic resonance imaging.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Graphic Jump Location

Figure 2. Frequency of presenting symptoms at the index attack (A) and plasma exchange response rate by presenting symptom among all patients with that symptom (B). Most patients had polysymptomatic attacks and thus could have more than 1 presenting symptom.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Graphic Jump Location

Figure 3. Representative gadolinium enhancement patterns, including homogeneous (A), heterogeneous (B), diffuse or patchy (C), fluffy or cotton ball (D), punctate (<2 mm) (E), nodular (>2 mm) (F), open ring to cortex (G), and arc with colocalization of the ring-enhancing lesion (arrow) (H), and T2-weighted hypointense rim (arrow) colocalizing with ring enhancement (I). A-H, T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced sequences.

Place holder to copy figure label and caption
Graphic Jump Location

Figure 4. Plasma exchange response rate with 95% confidence interval (A) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (B) by brain magnetic resonance imaging feature on the largest lesion. A, Bars indicate the plasma exchange response rate; lines, 95% confidence interval. P values are based on unadjusted logistic regression models. B, The adjusted model was adjusted for days to plasma exchange on the log-transformed scale, Expanded Disability Status Scale score at the time of plasma exchange, and deep tendon reflexes. RELs indicates ring-enhancing lesions.




Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Citing articles are presented as examples only. In non-demo SCM6 implementation, integration with CrossRef’s "Cited By" API will populate this tab (http://www.crossref.org/citedby.html).
Submit a Comment


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Sign In to Access Full Content

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

Articles Related By Topic
Related Topics
PubMed Articles

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature
Table 9.2-3 Refuted Evidence From Observational Studiesa