We're unable to sign you in at this time. Please try again in a few minutes.
We were able to sign you in, but your subscription(s) could not be found. Please try again in a few minutes.
There may be a problem with your account. Please contact the AMA Service Center to resolve this issue.
Contact the AMA Service Center:
Telephone: 1 (800) 262-2350 or 1 (312) 670-7827  *   Email: subscriptions@jamanetwork.com
Error Message ......
Correspondence |

Warfarin Therapy Does Not Increase Risk of Symptomatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Eligible Patients After Intravenous Thrombolysis—Reply

Shyam Prabhakaran, MD, MS; Ji Y. Chong, MD
Arch Neurol. 2011;68(1):135-138. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2010.324.
Text Size: A A A
Published online


In reply

We welcome the data provided by Levin et al. Indeed, a strong motivation for the publication of our single-center experience1 was to encourage others to do the same and to open a dialogue on this important and as yet unanswered question.

As Levin and colleagues' data suggest, there was no hemorrhage risk in warfarin-treated patients, while our data suggest a high risk; therein lies quite a range of possibilities. To conclude anything based on either article would be flawed; both are limited by small sample sizes and are open to multiple biases (type I and type II errors). For example, the small number of patients in their registry who were taking warfarin and were treated with tPA could suggest that warfarin-treated patients were preferentially selected for intravenous thrombolysis in mild cases and treated with endovascular approaches if moderate or severe deficits were noted. An analysis accounting for National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score would be helpful but difficult to determine in an administrative data set. As you rightly point out and we stated in our discussion, additional confounders including age and stroke subtype need to be included in large multivariable models. Thus, the final answer will not come from small series like ours but a large detailed database such as the Get With The Guidelines stroke registry.

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

First Page Preview

View Large
First page PDF preview





Also Meets CME requirements for:
Browse CME for all U.S. States
Accreditation Information
The American Medical Association is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The AMA designates this journal-based CME activity for a maximum of 1 AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM per course. Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Physicians who complete the CME course and score at least 80% correct on the quiz are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 CreditTM.
Note: You must get at least of the answers correct to pass this quiz.
Please click the checkbox indicating that you have read the full article in order to submit your answers.
Your answers have been saved for later.
You have not filled in all the answers to complete this quiz
The following questions were not answered:
Sorry, you have unsuccessfully completed this CME quiz with a score of
The following questions were not answered correctly:
Commitment to Change (optional):
Indicate what change(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.
Your quiz results:
The filled radio buttons indicate your responses. The preferred responses are highlighted
For CME Course: A Proposed Model for Initial Assessment and Management of Acute Heart Failure Syndromes
Indicate what changes(s) you will implement in your practice, if any, based on this CME course.


Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

0 Citations

Sign in

Purchase Options

• Buy this article
• Subscribe to the journal
• Rent this article ?

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging & repositioning the boxes below.

See Also...
Articles Related By Topic
Related Collections

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice, 3rd ed
Assessing the Strength of Recommendations: The GRADE Approach

Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice, 3rd ed
Are the Results Valid?